Published · Updated
Hit rate means little without price: breakeven is 52.4% at -110 and 60% at -150. Hit rate alone is misleading without ROI; here is how to read both.
Hit rate means little without price. At standard -110 totals/spread vig, breakeven is 52.4%. At -150 moneyline favorites, breakeven is 60%. So a 53% hit rate on -110 markets is +0.6 percentage points of edge, which compounds to real money over volume. A 53% hit rate on -150 favorites loses money.
Hit rate alone is misleading. ROI per unit risked is the real metric, because hit rate ignores price. A pick service hitting 52% at average +120 underdog odds prints far more than one hitting 58% at average -180 favorites.
A service advertising "59% MLB picks this season" sounds great until you check the prices. If most picks are -200 heavy favorites, 59% hits about 8 percentage points BELOW the implied probability (-200 = 66.7% implied), and the service is bleeding money. A service hitting 53% at average -110 is making about 1.2% ROI. The 53% service is the better service.
Always check: hit rate AND average odds AND ROI together. Any one of those alone is incomplete.
The full track record shows every staked Bookie Bullies pick since launch, with hit rate, ROI, and per-bucket breakdown (sport × bet type × confidence tier). Numbers come from the site's pick ledger, graded automatically against official MLB box scores. We display both the aggregate hit rate (all graded picks) and ROI-on-units (only picks with real odds AND non-zero unit stakes, which excludes legacy pre-Kelly picks).
Pull their last 100-200 graded picks. Compute: hit rate, average odds, ROI per unit, ROI for the Lock tier specifically. If they don't show all four publicly, evaluate yourself by logging picks for 60 days. Any service with >200 picks of public data and positive ROI passes the bar; under that, treat with skepticism.
At standard -110 vig (spreads and totals), 52.4% is breakeven. At -120 moneylines, breakeven is 54.5%. At -150 moneylines, breakeven is 60%. The hit rate a service needs depends on the average price it bets.
A 55% hit rate is good IF the average odds are -120 or better. On -110 spreads, 55% is +2.6% edge after vig (good). On -180 heavy favorites, 55% is losing money because implied probability is 64%. Always check hit rate against the prices it was earned at.
Even a genuine edge is small per unit risked, so treat any claim of a large ROI over a big sample with skepticism: variance, survivorship bias (the failures aren't shown), or fraud can explain it.
Four metrics: hit rate (wins divided by graded picks), ROI per unit (net profit divided by total risked), closing line value (did the price beat the close on average), and Brier score (calibration of probability estimates to outcomes). All four together give the full picture.
No. 60% is required only on heavy moneyline favorites (-150 or worse). On -110 lines, 53% is profitable. On +130 underdogs, 43.5% is breakeven. The required hit rate depends entirely on the average odds being bet, not on the bet type alone.